Remove Evaluation Remove Problem Remove Test Remove Time
article thumbnail

The Unrecognized Risk of Status Quo Problem-Solving Skills for Grantmakers

sgEngage

In a sector that is so risk-averse—afraid of change, reluctant to explore new ideas, and adopt new practices—why do we rely on super risky problem-solving skills? She encourages us, as sector professionals, to rethink our outdated problem-solving habits and stop making assumptions without acknowledgment and testing.

Problem 80
article thumbnail

Doing good with AI tools: Navigating ethical considerations for the social sector 

Candid

This is a time of accessible AI—anyone with an internet connection can use state-of-the-art tools to help with tasks like brainstorming ideas, generating art, and drafting documents. We addressed these problems through data investigations and corrections, and enhancements to how we sample data. What can bias look like in the data?

Tools 52
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Are we building the Candid tools you need? 

Candid

To understand how Candid products can best serve our users, we need to know what problems those users are trying to solve. What problems are we trying to solve? In addition, our user experience team conducts extensive research—surveys, interviews, usability tests, and data analysis on specific areas where we know there is a need.

Tools 64
article thumbnail

Is your nonprofit thinking about using ChatGPT? Your first step is to do no harm

Candid

Chatbots developed by nonprofits for programs and services have faced challenges at times as well. At the same time, finding human counselors has been a struggle. Second, chatbots and other AI technologies need to be carefully designed and tested for human interaction and bias to mitigate risks.

Literacy 131
article thumbnail

My Notes from Next Generation Evaluation Meeting

Beth's Blog: How Nonprofits Can Use Social Media

The conference was framed around the question: Given the convergence of networks and big data and the need for more innovation, what evaluation methods should be used to evaluate social change outcomes along side traditional methods? I followed the developmental evaluation thread most closely. Here are my notes.

article thumbnail

Beyond the RFP: How to Choose Technology Partners for Impact

sgEngage

Grants managers are adept problem solvers. I think this problem, RFPs vs. Impact, is solvable, but we need to explore new approaches to partnering with technologists who are responsible for contributing to the development, application, and advancement of social sector technologies. Grants managers are adept problem solvers.

Impact 78
article thumbnail

How Grantmakers Can Improve Collaboration Through Empathy and Experimentation

sgEngage

For example…” What was interesting is that after they made these types of statements, what they all went on to share about how they granted funds, vetted applications, organized their boards, and the process by which they evaluated their grantee partners was very, very similar. Testing Your Assumptions. Collaboration in a Crisis.