Allegiance Group

APRIL 15, 2024

Direct mail fundraising should be an integral part of your nonprofit’s direct response strategy. When leveraged with other communication channels, direct mail can generate significant engagement and gift-giving from donors. Allegiance Group makes achieving direct mail success simple. Does direct mail work? Contact Us!

Mail 52

Mail Fundraising Nonprofit Channel 52

Get Fully Funded

MAY 2, 2022

Go into the planning stage of your virtual event with a can-do attitude, knowing you can create something fun and meaningful. Carefully evaluate each idea so you can choose the one that will bring you the most money and awareness for the least investment of time and money. But not all of them are right for you. And the weather!

Virtual 111

Virtual Ideas Online Fundraising 111

Wild Apricot

JUNE 27, 2008

Effective Knowledge Transfer and Exchange for Nonprofit Organizations: A Framework, from Imagine Canada (formerly the Canadian Centre for Philanthropy), provides a framework to help nonprofits plan, conduct, and evaluate their efforts at knowledge transfer and exchange. Evaluation. logs and evaluation forms â?? E-mail marketing.

Knowledge 60

Knowledge Effective PDF Evaluation 60

Neon CRM

MAY 18, 2023

Conversely, if the technology your nonprofit uses is actually making things harder for your team, it may be time to evaluate a new solution. Common channels include email, direct mail, social media, phone calls, your website, etc. But there are still ways to use direct mail strategically that will maximize the bang for your buck.

Raise 98

Raise Strategy Help Fundraising 98

ASU Lodestar Center

MARCH 30, 2011

ASU Home ASU A-Z Index My ASU Colleges & Schools Directory Map About Blog Academics Organizational Assistance Emerging Leaders Professional Development Philanthropy Research News & Events You are here: Home → Blog Pages Blog Home Write for us! Jessica - Great point. about service and community issues. Central Ave.

Student 40

Student Alternative Arizona Americorp 40

Museum 2.0

MAY 13, 2010

He set up an infrastructure for people to evaluate submissions by giving it a yes, no, or maybe, with comments. The content was all over the map. There was a “let’s make it happen” attitude that I think was really appealing. How did you read them and cull down the list in the time you had? Were the submissions really variable?

Participatory 36

Participatory Journal San Francisco Interview 36