Remove Content Remove Participatory Remove Remix Remove Voice
article thumbnail

Take a Side Trip to the Denver Art Museum

Museum 2.0

There is no dissonance between the museum’s formal voice and laminate and the visitors’ pens and paper. There are stacks of graphics, cut-out reproductions from the real rock posters on display next door, which visitors can place under the transparencies to arrange and remix into poster designs of their own choosing.

Denver 21
article thumbnail

Museum Photo Policies Should Be as Open as Possible

Museum 2.0

Visitors may make inappropriate gestures in photos with museum content, thus distorting institutional values and intent. To me, an open photo policy is a cornerstone of any institution that sees itself as a visitor-centered platform for participatory engagement. Aesthetics of Experience: Photo-taking is distracting for other visitors.

Museum 54
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Future of Authority: Platform Power

Museum 2.0

For hundreds of years, we've owned the content and the message. While we may grudgingly acknowledge the fact that visitors create their own versions of the message around subsets of the content, we don't consciously empower visitors to redistribute their own substandard, non-authoritative messages. Content expertise matters.

article thumbnail

Sharing Power, Holding Expertise: The Future of Authority Revisited

Museum 2.0

While I originally wrote this post to advocate for more participatory practice (i.e. For hundreds of years, we've owned the content and the message. In these conversations, people often say, "don't expert voices matter?" Content expertise matters. Content control shouldn't. and my emphatic response is YES.