These is a rough cut where I've riffed on some of the ideas in David Armano's "The Collective Focus Group:Listen, Learn, and Adapt" and extended them to nonprofits and social media. I was inspired wondered how and if it might translate to nonprofits and social media. I think that listen, learn, and adapt is the secret sauce to social media strategy success! Now say that five times fast!
What I need is your input -I'd love to hear about your social media "adaption stories" - please leave me a comment.
I think "Return on Insight" can co-exist with traditional "Return on Investment" approaches for social media, not replace it. More on that later.
I'm also using this for the upcoming WeAreMedia Workshop in San Francisco which has a section on experiments and measurement. I'm also doing a session at the NTC in April called "Mapping Metrics To Strategy: Using Measurement To Improve Your Social Media Efforts" with panelists Wendy Harman, Red Cross, Qui Diaz, Livingston Communications, Danielle Brigida, NWF, and Susan Granger, PDF.
Listening
Listening is knowing what is being said online about your organization and your field. Listening is the first step, but you do it before, during, and after the project. In other words, you never take your listening ears off. It becomes part of your organization's culture.
It can be hard to retool an organization's culture to do listening as a daily part of the work flow, particularly if it isn't valued or there are concerns about negatives.
The Red Cross has overcome these hurdles. They use social media to achieve goals of increased transparency and increased donations of blood, time, and money. In that order. Listening is an important piece of the strategy. This was over two years ago.
As Wendy Harman, Red Cross Social Media Manager, observes, "When Katrina hit, we knew people are talking but we’re not listening to conversation. First, it felt like we were going to do battle. But now, the process of listening has changed concerns into strong interest about what people have to say."
The first project was to listen to what was being said on blogs about the Red Cross. As the chief listener for the organization, Wendy honed her listening literacy skills using free tools like google alerts, technorati, RSS reader, and delicious. She would listen, aggregate, analyze, and distribute to key subject matter experts within the organization on a consistent basis.
Listening leads to engagement. Wendy documented many different stories and shared these internally. The examples would show how engaging with people changed them from complainers to fans. Here's but one example from a blogger:
They've had months and months to hone their work flow and the Red Cross Social Media Team has it down to a science. They determine what comments need action, whether to say thank you and build a relationship, repair a customer service issue, or ignore. They spend time reading other posts by the blogger to help make this decision. They now use this approach with other channels, like Twitter, for example.
Because of the volume and using free tools, Wendy had to do a lot of heavy cut and paste to analyze, summarize, and distribute the information. With a better understanding on the value that continuous listening provides the organization, they are now investing in professional tools, like Radian 6.
Key points:
- Relationship building lays groundwork for future campaigns to raise time, money, and blood
- Identifies influencers
- Documentation creates internal value
- Listening skills and tools upgraded
- What works used for future campaigns
Learning
“If you don’t launch, you don’t learn.” David Armano
Learning is using experiments with metrics and the right questions at the right point to understand what works, what doesn’t. This is where the pavement hits the road. You won't be able to reap the full potential of social media unless you begin and get past any social media stalemate.
What does learning actually mean? You have to think like a scientist, documenting your experiments at the beginning, middle, and end. You also need to observe like a primatologist, like Jane Goodall. Perhaps that a bad analogy - certainly your donors aren't primates. Armano describes this as digital anthropologists sifting through qualitative data and metrics to reap insights.
I'll share my process and I understand that I'm probably a crazy person. I also know there is some resistance to document while you're doing, but I think it is essential to learning - especially at the practitioner level. Here's what I do:
I don't wait until the end of the project. I grab a little something everyday. It could be as simple as opening up a google document and dropping in a few bullet points or cutting and pasting a comment. The point is - you need to steal five or ten minutes from the doing to reflect in action. Since I'm a visual person, I also use flickr as a documentation tool - I do a lot of screen shots with snagit and annotate. I also bookmark posts that reference the project using a unique project tag. If I'm working with a team versus solo, I'll also share some summaries of the most important learnings. I also tweaking as I go - mostly messaging and mostly clarifying.
2. Pick the right hard data points
I know from experience what the most important metrics are to track for different types of projects. They are different depending on the audience and goals. Here is where more is less is really important.
3. Harvest your insights
At the end of the project, I do a wrap up with all the bites and pieces I've collected. I do a "by the numbers" summary, I look patterns and trends in the comments or visuals, and look at what other nonprofits are doing in the space. The important piece is to ask questions, not just look at numbers.
4. Hit the Pause Button
I usually write something up that anwers the question - "If I were to do this again next step, what would I do differently?" I don't wait until the day before I'm going to do something similar again. You best insights come right after you've completed the project and had a day or two of distance. Then you have captured those thoughts and when you begin planning for the next iteration - you have not lost those valuable insights.
A few points about social media metrics. While some of the measurement concepts for social media remain the same as traditional Web analytics, there are some new ideas to embrace. Steve Rubel wrote about this in a post called "Page Views Are Officially Dead" two years ago. Page views may not be dead, but you need to use engagement metrics. I've written about this as it relates to blogging quite a bit. Again, it isn't the numbers in isolation. It is the time that you spend looking at metrics in the context of your strategy and asking questions.
Yesterday, I interviewed Jake Brewer who is the Internet Manager at the Energy Action Coalition about how they use metrics to generate insights about their YouTube Channel.
Rachel Happe has a great list of social media metrics and it is a good starting point. If you're a metrics geek and want to go deeper, visit my personal learning space for Social Media Metrics. But do me a favor, please. Please don't get so obsessed with metrics that you loose site of how you're going to use them! And remember,
- Objective, audience, strategy and link to your metric
- Pick the right ones!
- Numbers alone are meaningless
- Combine with other measures and qualitative data
- Harvest insights
Adapt
The definition of adapt is using insights to make corrections to improve results the next time around. You have to be nimble and that can be hard.
I've watched the Carrie Lewis at the Humane Society do a fantastic job of adapting the organization's social media projects. In 2007, the Human Society implemented its first photo petition campaign to protest Wendy's treatment of animals
. They tracked the number of photo submissions they got, but they also
listened carefully to the responses they got from participants.
As Carrie Lewis mentions in the comments in the blog post , "Since this was our first run at a photo petition, it was difficult to
get across exactly what we wanted people to do without writing a book.
So every person that wrote in and needed help was answered personally.
This gave us a good idea of how to more clearly explain ourselves next
time." This particular photo campaign had many technical
glitches and ultimately the number of submissions was less than
impressive. Did HSUS proclaim that photo competitions were a waste of
time?
No.
The next iteration of a photo contest, LOL Seals , made it as easy as possible for people to participate. That's what they had learned from the first campaign. The first contest, they asked people to upload their photos and tag it themselves, which meant they had to create a Flickr account and know what “tagging” was. The second contest, they used the Flickr API which made everything automatic -- from tagging and uploading without the user having to even touch Flickr. They had about 3,000 submissions and captured about 2,000 new email addresses.
They've recently implemented an online photo contest that combines wisdom of the crowds with person to person fundraising. There is a web and Facebook version. It looks, from the outside, like a great success so far and this would not have happened with out these earlier versions.
It's much easier to adapt your social media project than to change other things in your organization that social media might shine a light on - customer service, programs, and services. And to make changes on those areas, it may require thinking staffing, work flow, and of course, involving leadership and others in your organization.
Armano has a some excellent organizational culture questions:
- Are you launching initiatives that can be easily updated? Are you enabling a "culture of rapid response?"
- Are you building a culture in which "failure" is acceptable?
- Are you allowing your teams to create "pilots" prior to scrutinizing them through traditional ROI exercises?
- Are you planning initiatives that will help your organization learn prior to backing major marketing campaigns?
Conclusion
- Don’t take off your listening ears
- Think like a scientist, observe like primatologist
- Evolution is a good thing
Listening Literacy Skills by Beth Kanter
How Listening Returns Value for Nonprofits by Beth Kanter
Nonprofits Need Different I and R Words by Beth Kanter
How o harvest insights by Beth Kanter
Now, it's your turn. What are some of your organization's social media adaption stories?
we have around a 65% utilization rate of the facebook app to entrants... very eye-opening to those who thought our email list (which is where most the entrants are coming from) was nothing but 55+ women and not on facebook!
http://apps.facebook.com/spayday
Posted by: Carie | February 05, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Beth thanks for sharing all of this. And thank you for the link I really appreciate it.
Posted by: kevin | February 06, 2009 at 04:39 AM
Beth,
Excellent post on the "secret sauce". Thanks!
Under learning, I would also ad that people should develop an ability to "Blink", as used by Max Gladwell.
As social media tools develop and grow at a faster rate, folks will need to develop the ability to use thier feelings as a measurement as well. I know this is tough for some people.
Qualitative analytics are important, but are much more valuable if folks can answer the question: "Does what I'm doing with social media feel right?"
Just my 3 cents.
John
Posted by: John Haydon | February 06, 2009 at 06:49 AM
Hi Beth,
Another stellar post. I can't help but think that engagement metrics are what's going to help set traditional metrics apart in the social media sphere. It's not just about broad numbers anymore, but how you energize, engage, spur action, and learn something that encourages changes - even small ones - from within your organization. It's about encouraging a cycle of communication that goes from outreach to insight and back again, otherwise, it's just not social at all.
What great discussions you start and amazing information you provide your readers. Great stuff.
Best,
Amber Naslund
Director of Community | Radian6
@AmberCadabra
Posted by: Amber Naslund | February 06, 2009 at 10:53 AM
The tools are easier now, but the trend has been around for a while. Back in 1999, I started an issue-oriented not-for-profit. I had both a web page and a discussion list going within the first week, and the discussion lists (we later added a private one for the core group) were a crucial communication tool.
I believe our rapid communication network was a good part of why we were able to bring 400 people out to public hearings, why we were able to respond nimbly,and why we won our battle in just 13 months--even though all the "experts" said we could never win.
I use this as a case study in my award-winning sixth book, Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First, BTW: www.principledprofit.com
Posted by: Shel Horowitz | February 06, 2009 at 02:27 PM
Wow - i think i need to read your posts a good 3-4 times before i digest all the information Beth :)
It seems the hardest step in all this is the 1st one - figuring out why you even want to get into social media, what you want to measure and how to know if your being sucessful.
There's a 'feeling' side to all this that says "if i'm getting to know people, spreading my message, engaging with my supporters and helping people connect with my nonprofit then i'm doing well", but life just isnt that simple when you have so show hard metrics on your sucess so that your nonprofit will continue.
I'd LOVE to see a full blown case study some day on the Red Cross or Humane Society (or others) that take us from day 1 to present.
http://twitter.com/franswaa
Posted by: frank | March 21, 2009 at 02:22 PM